The first thing she did on
joining the circle was to make sure she played and laughed with the man like
everybody else. But then, at some points, with her, some things really seemed
to go off. She began to lay claim to the guy in some form of ways, while acting
all coy as though she never cared about him. She would jokingly fight anyone trying
to call his name in a different way that suggested a different meaning, which
in some ways threatened both her claim to the guy, and the ‘joy’ of having him
some day.
Well, long story cut short, the
lady played her game so well, and in the space of months, she ‘landed’ herself
the guy. Like one assuming a new office, the first thing she did was to in some
ways pursue those he was particularly close to, especially those the man had
done things for in the past that suggested a possible likeness. The second
thing she did, amidst many other things, was to isolate this man from the ‘reach’
of others, such that in places where the man and all the other ladies stayed to
joke together, he was not found anymore. Slowly, he began to be seen in places that
seemingly was unavoidable- church and of course his work area when stumbled
upon. Things like joking together with others became a thing of the past. Well,
it never took long for the ladies to pick the signals and in the long run and
in some ways, ‘abandon’ the guy, since his new boo would have nothing to do
with them…
Going with this scenario (which
is a real-life scenario by the way), the question is - should dating or being
engaged to a man cause you to make the man’s life generically exclusive? Should
his life only be with you? And as a matter of fact- revolve only around you?
To answer the question from my
own perspective, I guess couples should still strive to have their individual
lives even after marriage. Shielding/keeping your partner to yourself would never
make him/her live his/her best life. There need to be singleness/individuality
to a great extent in marriage, so each party don’t get so tired of themselves,
and at that- irritated. Sadly, the couples above are no longer together, because
nothing in the way they went about their relationship (especially the lady)
signifies ‘healthy’. When you give air to your relationship (by giving your partner
the space to be his/herself), you give life and freshness to the relationship.
Otherwise, the relationship would become suffocative and great would be the
stench of it when it dies, because to start with, it was never built on what
can be seen to be a healthy foundation.
This been said, what do you think
about the whole situation? Do you think being in a relationship/being engaged or
actually being married to someone should mark the end of one’s freedom and
level of interaction with people?
Till we come each other’s way
next week, let’s stay interactive and happy with our environment. Would be a pleasure to read our opinions in the comment session below. Much love.
Photo Credit: Google Image
Connect with me on social media via-
Facebook: Eniola Olaosebikan
Instagram: cream_legend
Twitter: TheEniolaO
LinkedIn: Eniola Olaosebikan
Instagram: cream_legend
Twitter: TheEniolaO
LinkedIn: Eniola Olaosebikan
ReplyDeleteThis article is so prime that it took me days to digest.
Yes, to an extent being in a relationship/being engaged or actually being married to someone should actually mark the end of ''one's freedom and level of interaction with people''. Marriage change a lot of things for both couples, I won't blame the lady much even though i feel she threw herself at the guy though she meant good at first by helping the guy gain more respect by jokingly fighting anyone trying to call his name in a different way that suggested a different meaning. Reason why I said she threw herself at him is because, love his sacrifice. If the guy love her that much, he will do all it takes sacrificially to keep her.
As simple as I may seems, insecurity is a critical issue and I stand to be corrected here in my comment. Depending on the spouses involve, what works for couple A might not necessary work for couple B. Its all about how we love and value the other person, If I realise my partners with whom I claim to love is insecure, then I don't think it should cost me anything to sacrificially do away with those things with which she feels insecure about vice versa, for peace to reign and overtime this insecurity tend to slide away with age and trust.
Yes, someone might be thinking its easier said than done, I agree couples can have their individual freedom to an extent like in areas relating to vision, passion, talents and goals as long as it doesn't jeopardize the relationship. For instance, if I do some profitable things that my partner doesn't like, the best way out of this is to communicate/justify reasons and benefits behind it. Likewise, if there are other wrong habits or wrong friends within my reach, nothing stops me from cutting away from them if my partner feel insecure around them.
Personally, Bad habits that has taken me years of discipline to do away with, I found them very easy to let go with marriage in view. FAMILY IS FIRST, relationships especially marriage is meant to make us better and not a slave of each other, couples also should learn to be flexible and not rigid with each other.
Thank you @Soul Writer.
Very true- @ 'what works for couple A might not necessarily work for couple B'. Like someone said as well based on this article- Life is not mathematics: different strokes for different folks.
DeleteThank you for your comment. Great to hear from you.